Tiempos de cambios: Estados Unidos, Latinoamérica y Cuba ante los problemas de Seguridad Global
lunes, 22 de septiembre de 2014
With Enemies Like Cuba, Who Needs Friends?
Obama designates Cuba a U.S. enemy; meanwhile, our militaries cooperate
By Marc Hanson In an interview given to New Yorker editor David Remnick earlier
this year, President Obama reflected on his place in history, saying “I
think we are born into this world and inherit all the grudges and
rivalries and hatreds and sins of the past.” One measure of any presidency might
well be how readily they reevaluate these historic antipathies, dissolve
senseless antagonisms whenever possible, and construct more productive
international relations for and on behalf of their citizens. This is, of
course, easier said than done. Most foreign policy challenges—such as
wars in the Middle East, terrorism, and the ongoing crisis in
Ukraine—have continued to confound the President and his advisers, and
understandably so. They are intractable; pose myriad threats; and
require a great deal of time, energy, resources, and political
maneuvering to address. Other foreign policy issues are more
straightforward; our interests are clear, and there is widespread
domestic and worldwide support for the proposed course of action. U.S.
policy toward Cuba is one such issue, and by the measure mentioned
above, President Obama is unwittingly falling short. On September 5, the anachronistic
nature of the U.S. embargo against Cuba came into jarring relief as past
and present collided. On a sleepy summer Friday afternoon, the White
House announced that President Obama had signed a continuation for Cuba falling under the Trading with the Enemy Act,
meaning that Cuba will remain on America’s enemies list and be subject
to the U.S. embargo for yet another year. The Act, which was originally
created to give the president control over trade during wartime, is one
of the six statutes on which the embargo rests. By itself, the
presidential declaration is unremarkable; it is more likely the result
of policy inertia overwhelming an overextended White House than serious
policy consideration. What is remarkable—bizarre, even—is the irony of
what was unfolding at the very moment that the White House was making
the announcement. It turns out that as the president
re-designated Cuba an American enemy, our military was closely
cooperating with the Cuban military to monitor an unresponsive aircraft
that cruised into Cuban airspace. (The timing of the declaration was so
well-designed to go unnoticed that no reporters made mention of this
curious case of incongruity in U.S. foreign policy; in fact, the only
coverage the presidential determination received this year was in the Costa Rica News.) Apparently unfazed by the enemy declaration, Cuba allowed the United States to fly a C-130 cargo plane and two F-15 fighter jets in its airspace to investigate the incident and made its own search and rescue resources available in case they were needed. It is hard to imagine that ISIS or any
other genuine enemy of the United States would coordinate so closely
with the U.S. military and allow U.S. military aircraft into their
airspace. The incident is just another manifestation of the absurdity of extending an old rivalry into an era when simple cooperation is in both countries’ interest. In fact, for the first time perhaps in
decades, this year the Obama administration actually had the domestic
political space it needs to take Cuba off the enemies list. In June, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aired her recommendation to end the embargo. For months now, increasing numbers of foreign policy thinkers are making public their views that the embargo is outmoded and unworkable.
The political downside to not renewing Cuba’s ignominious designation has all but entirely disappeared. Poll after poll has
shown that the American people no longer support travel and trade
restrictions on Cuba and would prefer they no longer exist. There is also a cost to inaction on
improving relations with Cuba in the foreign policy sphere. In 2015, for
the first time, Cuba will finally be invited to the Summit of the
Americas. As policy expert Richard Feinberg assesses in his Americas
Quarterly article Cuba and the Summit of the Americas,
“In coming months, the United States is going to face a tough choice:
either alter its policy toward Cuba or face the virtual collapse of its
diplomacy toward Latin America.” Clearly, not renewing Cuba’s listing
would have been good policy and good politics. It would seem that it’s
high time for President Obama to reappraise this particular inherited
grudge and make a mark in history as a president willing to bury a
hatred that belongs in the past. Marc Hanson is WOLA's Senior Associate for Cuba.
In an interview given to New Yorker editor David Remnick earlier this year, President Obama reflected on his place in history, saying “I think we are born into this world and inherit all the grudges and rivalries and hatreds and sins of the past.”
One measure of any presidency might well be how readily they reevaluate these historic antipathies, dissolve senseless antagonisms whenever possible, and construct more productive international relations for and on behalf of their citizens. This is, of course, easier said than done. Most foreign policy challenges—such as wars in the Middle East, terrorism, and the ongoing crisis in Ukraine—have continued to confound the President and his advisers, and understandably so. They are intractable; pose myriad threats; and require a great deal of time, energy, resources, and political maneuvering to address.
Other foreign policy issues are more straightforward; our interests are clear, and there is widespread domestic and worldwide support for the proposed course of action. U.S. policy toward Cuba is one such issue, and by the measure mentioned above, President Obama is unwittingly falling short.
On September 5, the anachronistic nature of the U.S. embargo against Cuba came into jarring relief as past and present collided. On a sleepy summer Friday afternoon, the White House announced that President Obama had signed a continuation for Cuba falling under the Trading with the Enemy Act, meaning that Cuba will remain on America’s enemies list and be subject to the U.S. embargo for yet another year. The Act, which was originally created to give the president control over trade during wartime, is one of the six statutes on which the embargo rests. By itself, the presidential declaration is unremarkable; it is more likely the result of policy inertia overwhelming an overextended White House than serious policy consideration. What is remarkable—bizarre, even—is the irony of what was unfolding at the very moment that the White House was making the announcement.
It turns out that as the president re-designated Cuba an American enemy, our military was closely cooperating with the Cuban military to monitor an unresponsive aircraft that cruised into Cuban airspace. (The timing of the declaration was so well-designed to go unnoticed that no reporters made mention of this curious case of incongruity in U.S. foreign policy; in fact, the only coverage the presidential determination received this year was in the Costa Rica News.)
Apparently unfazed by the enemy declaration, Cuba allowed the United States to fly a C-130 cargo plane and two F-15 fighter jets in its airspace to investigate the incident and made its own search and rescue resources available in case they were needed.
It is hard to imagine that ISIS or any other genuine enemy of the United States would coordinate so closely with the U.S. military and allow U.S. military aircraft into their airspace. The incident is just another manifestation of the absurdity of extending an old rivalry into an era when simple cooperation is in both countries’ interest.
In fact, for the first time perhaps in decades, this year the Obama administration actually had the domestic political space it needs to take Cuba off the enemies list. In June, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aired her recommendation to end the embargo. For months now, increasing numbers of foreign policy thinkers are making public their views that the embargo is outmoded and unworkable.
The political downside to not renewing Cuba’s ignominious designation has all but entirely disappeared. Poll after poll has shown that the American people no longer support travel and trade restrictions on Cuba and would prefer they no longer exist.
There is also a cost to inaction on improving relations with Cuba in the foreign policy sphere. In 2015, for the first time, Cuba will finally be invited to the Summit of the Americas. As policy expert Richard Feinberg assesses in his Americas Quarterly article Cuba and the Summit of the Americas, “In coming months, the United States is going to face a tough choice: either alter its policy toward Cuba or face the virtual collapse of its diplomacy toward Latin America.”
Clearly, not renewing Cuba’s listing would have been good policy and good politics. It would seem that it’s high time for President Obama to reappraise this particular inherited grudge and make a mark in history as a president willing to bury a hatred that belongs in the past.
Marc Hanson is WOLA's Senior Associate for Cuba.